Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and Peoples Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The area of attachment inside the individual mating. Writeup on General Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A beneficial. (2002). Sites contradiction reviewed. Diary of Public Points, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technical one reduces personal wedding and you will psychological well-getting? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Number, timing, and you may time of marriages and you will divorces. Latest Inhabitants Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional data of closeness, welfare, and relationship: Testing the brand new assumptions of your triangular principle off like. Emotional Reports, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Perception top in the doing tough: Public contrasting contained in this romantic relationships. Journal from Identification and you will Public Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. Good., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit knowledge from romantic competition. Record from Character and you can Societal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
Good. (2001)mitment and you will dating restoration mechanisms
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention to help you glamorous options: The changed therapy of relationship repairs. Evolution and you can Peoples Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential analysis regarding conflict https://internationalwomen.net/da/aserbajdsjan-kvinder/ and you can agreement when you look at the disturb and nondistressed relationship partners. Log off Consulting and you will Scientific Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Eco-friendly, A. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Dating creation on the internet: What’s the larger attraction? Journal of Societal Products, 58(1), 9–31.
Some great benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization additionally the design from fulfillment from inside the personal dating
Neff, L. An excellent., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-assessment objectives inside the personal relationships: A model of international improvement and specific verification. In P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Insights ents on the study of couple correspondence (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge School Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-therapist bond through the lens regarding connection principle. Psychotherapy: Theory, Lookup, Routine, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The newest social overseeing system: Increased sensitivity to social signs given that a transformative response to personal exception to this rule. Inside the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The latest public outcast: Ostracism, social different, getting rejected, and you can bullying (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Psychology Press.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Globally and particular relational activities in the contact with societal connections. Record out of Character and you can Public Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you may guidance trying for the romantic relationships. Character and Social Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and certain connection representations in adulthood: Is there a love?. Log From Societal And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In the J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic matchmaking: Restoration and you can enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection actually perception certainly partners due to the fact a purpose of brand new similarity within common experience. Identity And Social Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Effects of salience regarding extrinsic benefits on taste and you will loving. Journal out-of Identity and you will Personal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.